<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ng Ariss Fong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ngariss.com/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ngariss.com/blog</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 20:08:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Registration: lack of good character based on criminal charges</title>
		<link>http://www.ngariss.com/blog/2013/05/20/registration-lack-of-good-character-based-on-criminal-charges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ngariss.com/blog/2013/05/20/registration-lack-of-good-character-based-on-criminal-charges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registration and Fitness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ngariss.com/blog/?p=1388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least in a regulatory system with a “good character” requirement where applicants do not have the benefit of good character being presumed, a regulatory may refuse to grant registration to an applicant who has been charged with serious criminal offences, such as drugging and sexually assaulting a female medical student. This sort of outcome [<a href="http://www.ngariss.com/blog/2013/05/20/registration-lack-of-good-character-based-on-criminal-charges/">Read More</a>]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ngariss.com/blog/2013/05/20/registration-lack-of-good-character-based-on-criminal-charges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conduct unbecoming of a professional: loud, verbally aggressive, and egregiously profane outbursts</title>
		<link>http://www.ngariss.com/blog/2013/05/20/conduct-unbecoming-of-a-professional-loud-verbally-aggressive-and-egregiously-profane-outbursts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ngariss.com/blog/2013/05/20/conduct-unbecoming-of-a-professional-loud-verbally-aggressive-and-egregiously-profane-outbursts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discipline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional Regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ngariss.com/blog/?p=1384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A professional may be responsible for “unprofessional conduct” in his private life, such as where the professional engages in a loud, verbal exchange with other parents at a school concert, in the presence of children. This is illustrated in Rathe v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, 2013 ONSC 821, although notably, the charge [<a href="http://www.ngariss.com/blog/2013/05/20/conduct-unbecoming-of-a-professional-loud-verbally-aggressive-and-egregiously-profane-outbursts/">Read More</a>]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ngariss.com/blog/2013/05/20/conduct-unbecoming-of-a-professional-loud-verbally-aggressive-and-egregiously-profane-outbursts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conduct unbecoming of a professional: threats of frivolous reports</title>
		<link>http://www.ngariss.com/blog/2013/05/20/conduct-unbecoming-of-a-professional-threats-of-frivolous-reports/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ngariss.com/blog/2013/05/20/conduct-unbecoming-of-a-professional-threats-of-frivolous-reports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discipline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional Regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ngariss.com/blog/?p=1382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The “private” or “personal” conduct of professionals can still be “unprofessional conduct” involving significant consequences. A reminder of this principle arises from the recent decision of Erdmann v. Institute of Chartered Accountants of Alberta, 2013 ABCA 147. Ms. E, a chartered accountant, engaged in a dispute with the builder of her residential condominium about a [<a href="http://www.ngariss.com/blog/2013/05/20/conduct-unbecoming-of-a-professional-threats-of-frivolous-reports/">Read More</a>]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ngariss.com/blog/2013/05/20/conduct-unbecoming-of-a-professional-threats-of-frivolous-reports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Four dogs, four cats, and access to one hamster</title>
		<link>http://www.ngariss.com/blog/2013/05/20/four-dogs-four-cats-and-access-to-one-hamster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ngariss.com/blog/2013/05/20/four-dogs-four-cats-and-access-to-one-hamster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ngariss.com/blog/?p=1390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There have been a few changes at Ng, Ariss, Fong. We sadly bid farewell to Benjamin Ralston who moved to the beautiful Dunedin, New Zealand to pursue other interests (not involving hobbits). We welcome Julia Hincks as our new articled student, and Kevin Quong and Kate Parisotto as our current legal research assistants. We are [<a href="http://www.ngariss.com/blog/2013/05/20/four-dogs-four-cats-and-access-to-one-hamster/">Read More</a>]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ngariss.com/blog/2013/05/20/four-dogs-four-cats-and-access-to-one-hamster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Criminal law and when a fetus is a child</title>
		<link>http://www.ngariss.com/blog/2013/05/20/criminal-law-and-when-a-fetus-is-a-child/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ngariss.com/blog/2013/05/20/criminal-law-and-when-a-fetus-is-a-child/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ngariss.com/blog/?p=1392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you attended our CBA Health Law presentation on notable cases in 2012, you would have heard Julia Hincks talk about the case of R. v. Levkovic, where a building superintendent cleaning a vacated apartment discovered a bag on the balcony containing the remains of a human baby, delivered at or near full term. The [<a href="http://www.ngariss.com/blog/2013/05/20/criminal-law-and-when-a-fetus-is-a-child/">Read More</a>]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ngariss.com/blog/2013/05/20/criminal-law-and-when-a-fetus-is-a-child/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
