Michael Ng

B.Comm. (UBC), LL.B. (UBC), LL.M. (Queen’s)

Michael’s favorite hoodie is from Kit and Ace, and his favorite legal project is writing great legal arguments. He has written more submissions and factums in his career than Pantone has colors. Michael`s work is known for its clarity, concision and depth. He is a lawyer for other lawyers and has written for all manner of trials and appeals.

Michael works in many areas, including aboriginal law. He wrote the argument that invalidated the government’s approval of the Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline project in Gitxaala Nation v. The Queen, 2016 FCA 187. More recently, he wrote the intervenor factum on aboriginal sacred lands for a Supreme Court Canada appeal of Ktunaxa Nation v. BC, 2015 BCCA 352.

Michael has worked on hundreds of complex commercial disputes, and ghostwrites court submissions for litigators in Canada. He has contributed to cases like Craigdarloch Holdings Ltd. v. Syscon Justice Systems Canada Ltd., 2010 BCSC 1186 (concerning agent commissions), Wah Fai Plumbing & Heating Inc. v. Ma, 2011 BCCA 26 (concerning builders liens), and a case that a court labelled as “stranger than fiction”, Lam v. Chiu, 2014 BCCA 32 (on assessments of credibility).

He has also written winning arguments in cases involving professionals, such as Newman v. Halstead, 2006 BCSC 65 (which addressed an Internet-based campaign of defamation against teaching professionals); Stuart v. British Columbia College of Teachers, 2005 BCSC 645 (which confirmed the need for mental culpability in cases of professional misconduct in BC); British Columbia College of Teachers v. Mitchell, 2005 BCCA 76 (concerning the reasonableness of regulatory decisions on penalty and name publication); and more recently, Scott v. College of Massage Therapists, 2016 BCCA 180 (about interim measures during complaint investigations under the Health Professions Act).

Michael believes that good writing is simple, precise, and thoughtful.