HPRB: Robustness of reasons when resolving complaints through remedial education under HPA s.36(1)(b)
The Health Professions Review Board has signaled to Inquiry Committees resolving complaints by way...
Read MoreThe Health Professions Review Board has signaled to Inquiry Committees resolving complaints by way...
Read MoreProfessional regulators are acutely aware nowadays of substantial equivalence issues in registration processes, given...
Read MoreToday, most self-regulating profession legislation expressly provide that former members can be disciplined for...
Read MoreOver the last few weeks we have explored the balancing act regulators may engage...
Read MoreIn a recent decision in the matter of Gichuru v. The Law Society of...
Read MoreIn a recent posting entitled Conference Questions: What should regulatory bodies disclose to complainants?...
Read MoreA court will defer to any finding of fact or law, or any exercise...
Read MoreThe need for an oral hearing before the Health Professions Review Board (the “HPRB”),...
Read MoreRegardless of the specific language in a profession’s governing statute or the governing body’s...
Read MoreDuring our 2011 Professional Regulation Conference, a question arose as to the information inquiry...
Read MoreThe issue of whether a professional disciplinary tribunal can rule on institutional bias, and...
Read MoreHearings are expensive processes for all parties. Respondents of course bear the expense of...
Read MoreWhenever an inquiry committee decides against sending a complaint matter to a hearing, the...
Read MoreIn 1987, BC courts found that a regulatory body could not discipline a former...
Read MoreLike the extraordinary action power under s.35 of the BC Health Professions Act, the...
Read More